Advocates step up as MLC turns 20 while Australian Government ignores sustainable seafarer welfare

On the 20^thanniversary of the Maritime Labour Convention, Human Rights at Sea calls on the Honorable Catherine King, Australia’s Minister for Transport, to take action on the consistent provision of seafarer welfare services after an advocate has travelled the nation securing funding in the absence of federal government support.

The February announcement that Flinders Port Holdings has committed $200,000 to Mission to Seafarers is a reminder that, around Australia, welfare funding for seafarers is being driven not by national policy or coordinated planning, but by the determination of a few individuals and the goodwill of a handful of port operators.

One of those individuals is Sue Dight, Regional Director, Mission to Seafarers. 

Dight has visited ports around Australia to raise money for the charity after being unsuccessful in her attempts to secure meaningful funding from the federal government.

Her efforts have produced a $2.5 million New South Wales Ports grant spread across four missions over five years, a new seafarer centre in Port Hedland funded by Pilbara Ports, and new buses for Southern Ports. 

Now, Flinders Ports has added $200,000 over two years.

The money goes to support the needs of over 500,000 seafarers arriving each year onboard the ships that underpin Australia’s economic security and supply chain resilience.

To get time ashore, some sacrifice rest time, and many may have just a few hours to contact friends and family, shop, seek medical advice, or simply relax and enjoy a change of environment.

“Australian charities are very supportive, but they also face funding challenges, and some have not been able to maintain their usual operating hours or advance new initiatives in, for example, counselling and mental health,” says Paul MacGillivary, a long-time seafarer welfare advocate and currently a Human Rights at Sea Global Ambassador in Australia.

The Maritime Labour Convention (MLC, 2006) calls for the establishment of port welfare committees to coordinate welfare provision at the local level. 

Without active committees, ports lack the governance structures required to assess needs, allocate resources, and ensure accountability, says MacGillivary. He was instrumental in setting up committees in Australia but now says no new port welfare committees have been established, nor existing ones revitalised, since 2022.

“Australia’s reliance on sporadic corporate generosity and individual advocacy is not a substitute for a national framework,” says MacGillivary. A modern maritime nation requires a coordinated, equitable, and transparent system for funding and delivering seafarer welfare services. This includes:

•          a national funding model that ensures baseline support for all ports

•          active, accountable port welfare committees in every port where welfare centres exist

•          consistent standards aligned with MLC obligations

•          mechanisms to ensure equitable distribution of resources.

“It is time for the Minister to demonstrate leadership at a national level and build a sustainable, equitable welfare system that reflects Australia’s responsibilities as a maritime nation and supports those people and organisations that are devoted to filling the current void.”

ENDS.

Read More (Maritime Levy Campaign Australia)

• Maritime Levy Campaign
• New Zealand Government drives legislative change in support of Seafarers’ Centres
• HRAS Pursues Australian Legislative Change for Long-Term Maritime Levy Seafarer Support
• Expansion of Port Welfare Committees in Australia driven by the changing dynamics of seafarer care
• Strategies To Overcome Obstacles To Implementing A Maritime Welfare Levy In Australia For Assured Seafarer On-Shore Welfare Facilities
• Shortfall in funding for seafarer welfare raised in UK Parliament
• Western Australian Forum to Review Potential for Welfare Levies
• Secure Funding needed for Seafarer Support Services during Port Calls

Source: Human Rights at Sea 2026. Author Paul MacGillivary. Editing by Wendy Laursen.

AI. AI was used in the initial research of this article.

Photo Credit: iStock.

Contact: If you have any questions, please write to us at enquiries@hrasi.org.

About Sharing. We welcome the use and dissemination of our copyrighted work with full, accurate and proper accreditation. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

 ©Copyright and Intellectual Property of Human Rights at Sea CIC (HRAS) 2025. All rights reserved.