A private survey of leading stakeholders conducted by Human Rights at Sea demonstrates a nationwide pattern of chronic under-funding in the provision of seafarer support services in Australia.
Human Rights at Sea conducted the online survey to identify what port welfare resources are already in place and any gaps that need to be addressed.
Over 500,000 seafarers visit Australian ports each year, and the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC, 2006) calls for the establishment of port welfare committees to coordinate welfare provision at a local level.
Survey responses were obtained from 14 locations. They indicate that welfare centres are heavily dependent on volunteers, many in their 70s and 80s. Most centres must restrict operating hours due to lack of resources, and some are only open in the afternoon on weekdays.
Yet, the services these centres provide can be critical to seafarer well-being. They include emergency medical support and advocacy, rights support, provision of Wi-Fi and SIM cards, transport to shops and medical appointments, support for mental and physical well-being, faith-based services, and currency exchange.
Responses indicate that between 5% and 50% of staff or volunteer time may be taken up by pursuing funding, with several stating that fundraising consumes half their available operational capacity.
“The survey reveals that seafarer welfare centres are doing extraordinary work, but the breadth of services provided far exceeds the resources available,” said Paul MacGillivary, a long-time seafarer welfare advocate and currently a Human Rights at Sea Global Ambassador in Australia. “The survey further reveals a consistent and urgent pattern across Australia’s ports: seafarer welfare centres are delivering essential frontline services despite chronic underfunding, insufficient staffing, and an ageing volunteer base.”
The survey asked respondents what they would do with more funding. Priorities included longer opening hours, paid drivers and centre managers, more ship visits, better communication with ships, expanded mental health and medical support and improved facilities.
The responses indicate that centres are largely calling for stabilisation and operational reinforcement, said MacGillivary.
“The survey supports the conclusion that the current model is structurally under-resourced and provides compelling evidence for the establishment of a nationally supported, contributory sustainable funding model for seafarer welfare.”
Human Rights at Sea has been campaigning for a coordinated national approach that includes predictable funding arrangements based on existing government levies charged to maritime companies since 2019. The NGO’s efforts were successful in New Zealand, providing a model that is aligned with MLC 2006 obligations and could be adapted to Australia.
ENDS.
Read about the HRAS Maritime Levy Campaign
Related News
- Advocates step up as MLC turns 20 while Australian Government ignores sustainable seafarer welfare
- Secure Funding needed for Seafarer Support Services during Port Calls
- Western Australian Forum to Review Potential for Welfare Levies
Download the Survey Report
ENDS.
Source: Human Rights at Sea
Authors: Wendy Laursen / Paul MacGillivary
AI. AI was not used in this article.
Photo Credit: iStock licensed.
About Sharing. We welcome the use and dissemination of our copyrighted work with full, accurate and proper accreditation. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.